Nevada Taverns or Slots Parlors: The Gaming War for the Roses
Nevada Gaming Commissioner John Moran Jr. questions an attorney during a commission meeting
The entire point of gaming regulation is to supply a solid, dependable and clear framework from which those in the gaming industry can run. Therefore Nevada Gaming Commission members were none too happy when regulations they put in position only 2 yrs ago, in 2011, regarding exactly how slot machines can operate in Nevada’s tavern environment, had been back front of them at a present meeting.
Regulation 3.015 ended up being back to roost, and laying some eggs.
Not Happy to Revisit Rules and Regs
Gaming Commission Chairman Pete Bernhard let it be known he was none too happy to see the issue that is regulatory in front of the commission.
‘ We do not desire to see the guidelines changed every two years. One for the worst things regulators can do would be to offer uncertainty. We thought we resolved this issue in 2011,’ Bernhard reiterated.
Creating the revisitation were two various sets of regulations from two different regulatory systems, each overlapping the other and creating a set that is murky of for tavern owners to abide by.
On the one hand, Regulation 3.015 ( seems aristocrat indian dreaming slot machine like a James Bond code that is operative) was created by the Commission to make slot parlors illegal; the sort exemplified by the plethora of Dottie’s chains found throughout the nevada valley. Competing business operators, since well since the Nevada Resort Association a lobbying team that pushes for its casino clients came back saying that Dottie’s and their ilk were not really ‘taverns,’ but slot that is small parlors that offered a smattering of desserts and a minimal bar just so they could pass muster with regulators.